There Isn't an AI Backlash. It's a Reaction to the Articulate Chatbot
- Jun 16
- 5 min read
Human exceptionalism is being blurred by AI.
When I was a child, I would go with my father to get the family car washed on Sundays. We knew the staff. They would wash the car completely by hand. After the car wash, my dad would take me to get ice cream.
Today, when I take my own daughter with me to the car wash, it's a 10-minute ordeal. Pull up to a kiosk, select a service, move forward.
Yet no one is protesting the presence of kiosks at car wash stations. We celebrate the convenience, the efficiency, and the ease. We never questioned what happened to the jobs that disappeared or the social interactions that no longer occurred. Furthermore, we never asked whether the kiosk or the car-washing machine was smart. After the car wash, I take my daughter to get ice cream.
Automation Isn't a Dirty Word
Our homes are filled with dishwashing machines, vacuum cleaners, laundry machines, and other gadgets that make life easier by producing the output in less time with less effort. We've adopted ovens that are "smart enough" to cook our prepackaged meals with the press of a single button.
But each of those examples masks an uncomfortable truth: they were once not only human tasks, but paid labor. And when those devices fail, we don't write essays about it or introduce derogatory terms to describe them.
Enter the AI Chatbot
When the world was introduced to ChatGPT in November 2022, there wasn't backlash. Instead, there was fanfare. The AI chatbot became the most rapidly adopted technology in history. Humans were chatting with AI, enjoying each conversation as they became familiar with the Other behind the screen.
For the first time in history, humans had a conversational audience that could respond fluently in their spoken and written languages. Parrots and chimpanzees can echo words and master short exchanges, but the AI chatbot is wholly fluent.
An AI chatbot has a "voice." It mimics the social and communicative dynamics that were once strictly reserved for humans.
One Craft at a Time
The AI chatbot wrote poems and humans thought it was funny. When it started to create art, some people became uncomfortable because it was quicker and cheaper than human-generated art. But, the general public didn't oppose the technology because "real art" has been expensive for years.
Then the chatbot started making music. Again, some people became uncomfortable. The argument was that AI was encroaching on what is truly human. But the AI chatbot continued to grow in popularity because most humans aren't musicians.
Then the chatbot showed up at work.
The music changed. The chatbot could still write poems, but it could also draft emails, summarize meetings, build presentations, and analyze data... cheerfully.
This time, humans didn't look away. They looked closer.
The AI You Don't See
But looking away isn't a recent phenomenon. Netflix used AI to recommend movies and television shows, and the public subscribed despite knowing AI was part of the engine. In the process, Netflix displaced the brick-and-mortar Blockbuster stores, where the staff knew the customers and friendships were formed.
Uber deployed personal transportation through an app, and again the public subscribed. It was trendy to catch an Uber, and AI was considered "cool." Yet Uber replaced the taxi industry in major cities globally. The yellow cab became nostalgia because the AI-powered alternative was deemed a modern convenience.
Netflix doesn't speak and neither does Uber. The AI runs silently in the background as people consume the outputs. The AI is invisible, but its impact is felt. It simply wasn't personal enough to make the consumer reject the technology.
Trauma Is Sometimes Unnamed
Humans are social creatures. We listen for our babies' first words because they represent the emergence of our children's cognition. Cognition isn't just a feature of being human. It allows us to communicate. It allows us to navigate our world. It enables us to work. It's the defining line between us and every other creature in the animal kingdom.
Sitting across from the Other isn't a trivial experience for humans who have been the apex predator of our planet for millennia. We had never been challenged intellectually and now we are challenged daily.
Are our poems better than the AI's? What about our analyses, or our slide decks at work? How do we feel when we watch an AI chatbot accept our instructions to "generate a painting of a parrot in the style of Monet" and return the result to us in seconds?
The trauma is unevenly distributed.
Companion or Nemesis
Netflix and Uber weren’t competition, just as vacuums, dishwashers, and smart ovens aren’t competition; they were simply goods and services.
The AI chatbot is both service and competition, and that is where the backlash lies. It is visible and, in some ways, loud. It competes for our attention and with our abilities.
People aren't anti-AI. They're afraid of a world in which the Other becomes the first-round draft pick for society's most prestigious jobs while humans sit on the bench. They're anxious about a world in which AI creates and produces, while humans consume and correct its outputs.
For some people, it's frightening.
It's Not Disdain. It's Grief.
Students aren't booing the mention of AI at commencement ceremonies because they disdain AI-enabled devices and companies. After all, they boo while filming the ceremony with their AI-enabled smartphones. What the graduates are rejecting is a world in which their potential is sidelined for the cheerful chatbot.
It is one thing for a machine to wash a car or recommend a movie. It is another thing entirely for a machine to encroach on human cognition, the very trait that has historically defined human exceptionalism.
And that is what the public is reacting to, not the presence of AI in everyday life.
Join the Conversation
"AI is the tool, but the vision is human." — Sophia B.
👉 For weekly insights on navigating our AI-driven world, subscribe to AI & Me:
Let’s Connect
I’m exploring how generative AI is reshaping storytelling, science, and art — especially for those of us outside traditional creative industries.
About the Author
Sophia Banton is an AI leader working at the intersection of AI strategy, communication, and human impact. With a background in bioinformatics, public health, and data science, she brings a grounded, cross-disciplinary perspective to the adoption of emerging technologies.
Beyond technical applications, she explores GenAI’s creative potential through storytelling and short-form video, using experimentation to understand how generative models are reshaping narrative, communication, and visual expression.
